I Will Quit Smoking – With determination anyone could do it!

Posts Tagged ‘addiction’

The FDA has decided to appeal the final decision of the U.S. District Court which ruled they have no jurisdiction over the sales of the e-cig. The District Court ruled that since the newest stop smoking product isn’t deemed a medicinal therapy, the FDA lacks the authority to regulate and control them. The FDA has taken issue concerning the Court’s ruling despite the fact they agree the Electronic Cigarette would in fact be valuable for smokers wanting to give up smoking cigarettes just as methadone helps opioid addicts with their dependence.

For anyone unfamiliar with this new product, it has grown into the most innovative smoking cessation product since the introduction of NRT (nicotine renewal therapies). It is a battery run device which was engineered to completely look like a cigarette. As soon as the user inhales a breath from the unit, it gives off a little shot of water vapor containing exclusively nicotine. These devices are refillable as well as rechargeable making them a lot less expensive than using tobacco. One of the benefits about their design is the fact that the nicotine refills can be bought in several strengths from 100 mg to zero mg nicotine allowing the smoker to over time taper off nicotine without having withdrawal discomforts.

People who smoke spend well over $1.6 billion dollars yearly for stop smoking products. Add in the $20 billion per year smokers invest in cigarettes and you will see how manipulating the esmoke industry may be motivated by more than the FDA’s concern in the health and safety of US citizens. People that use the electric cigarette realize this ulterior motive and have turned into a fierce and formidable group which demand the FDA consider e-cigarettes to be a healthier substitute for cigarettes. Opponents of the smokeless cigarette, including the ALA (American Lung Association) and FDA, would like them restricted unless their safety can be established.

The Food and Drug Administration has attempted more than once to gain regulation of the esmoke. The initial attempt was noting a currently debunked analysis claiming that the nicotine liquid used to re-fill the ecig contained hazardous contaminants. Research backed by a large smokefree cigarette vendor has since revealed the FDA’s research practiced flawed technological analysis procedures and thus is invalid. Now, the ruling against the Food & Drug Administration’s allegation that smokefree cigarettes are health related products seems to be yet another nail in the coffin of the Food & Drug Administration’s effort to control them.

There are definitely a few unknowns linked to the smoke free cigarette like the long term results of their use. But the fact remains, they’re by far a significantly better alternative to using tobacco. Rather than the Food and Drug Administration spending hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars on court fees to gain control of the e-cig, perhaps they should begin a comprehensive study of their health impact. That is if, of course, they’re genuinely concerned with the health and well being of smoke-free cigarette users.

Want to See more about the ecig and the current controversy? Just visit Barry Wilson’s site for information on e-cigs and other smoking aids.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Technorati Tags: addiction, addictions, diseases, drug addiction, fitness, health, health and fitness, health care, home health, law, medicine, quit smoking, Quit Smoking Effects, self improvement

The smoke free tobacco showdown just erupted due to the addition of yet another contender. The pharmaceutical icon GSK (Glaxo Smith-Kline) has loaded their big guns and is going to be aiming straight at the newest orally dispersed nicotine supplements made by RJR (R.J. Reynolds). GSK has demanded the Food and Drug Administration request R.J. Reynolds to remove its orally dispersed nicotine products entirely from the marketplace. Even though still under assessment from the FDA, RJR has released their dissolvable tobacco products into test segments all around the country.

GSK has demanded the FDA require R.J. Reynolds to remove its orally dispersed tobacco products entirely from the market place. Even though still under assessment from the FDA, RJR has launched their orally disintegrating nicotine products into test markets around the country.

The pharmaceutical corporation takes issue with the simple fact that before GSK had been permitted to release their nicotine-replacement therapies, they were required to pay out millions of dollars performing medical tests the FDA said were needed due to safety reasons. GSK questions why RJR has been permitted to begin selling their products although not spending money on safety trials. Especially troubling to GSK is the fact RJR is in fact advertising its product to be a tobacco cessation aid as well as a safer, healthier replacement for tobacco use.

This controversy with smoke free nicotine products is actually not new. Since the late 90s the Food and Drug Administration, together with Local, State and Federal jurisdictions, have been attempting to prevent the sales of items including the electronic cigarette in addition to dissolvable tobacco products. Opponents claim that these smoking substitutes can become a “gateway” product leading children along with non-smokers to eventually take up cigarette smoking. All of the currently available smoking substitution products continue to contain the terribly addictive element nicotine.

GSK calls RJR’s claims that their latest product may be used to quit smoking an “untested promotional tactic”. GSK suggests “there are significant opportunities to boost the impact of current stop smoking tools, including expanding access to and use of NRT techniques.” Basically, GSK believes their comprehensively tested NRT products should not have to compete with untested and perhaps harmful things like dissolvable tobacco and the e-cigarette.

Want to See more about the electronic cigarette starter kit and the current controversy? Just visit Elton Jeffries site for information on e-cigs and other smoking aids.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Technorati Tags: addiction, addictions, diseases, drug addiction, fitness, health, health and fitness, health care, home health, law, medicine, quit smoking, Quit Smoking Effects, self improvement

The Ecig controversy went viral once the FDA published a study on smokeless cigarettes and their associated nicotine containing solution “e-liquid”. The Food and Drug Administration claimed ejuice is unhealthy because it is made with toxic chemicals regarded as poisonous to humans. The Ecig camp fired back by hiring a prominent analysis firm to look at the FDA report and the procedures implemented to arrive at their conclusions. This firm discovered the results obtained by the FDA study was incorrect since the analysis procedures they utilized were far from those needed to produce such specific determinations.

So presently, over a year after, what have we discovered relating to the safety of ecigarettes? Well, quite simply, very little has changed. Each side of the controversy continue to claim their assertions are correct. In the end, the smokeless cigarette user is still in the dark about the safety of the electric cigarette. Why don’t we take a closer look at what precisely we really do know.

In the interest of brevity, I won’t go deep into specifics regarding how the smokeless cigarette operates or how it is used. It’s in essence a nicotine delivery device not different from the doctor prescribed Nicotrol inhaler. It functions by heating and vaporizing a combination of glycerin and nicotine when the user inhales a puff from the device. The Food and Drug Administration’s primary point of contention (now confirmed wrong via the subsequent scientific study) is the nicotine containing fluid they analyzed included contaminants unsafe to humans. The discussion concerning this aspect is not the issue at hand. The most crucial factor to remember may be the fact that the Food and Drug Administration might have, if intentional or not, made a most important finding.

In the USA, most everything we eat or drink is required to adhere to procedures regulated by a number of government departments which ensure our health and safety. We sometimes see products that are recalled due to the smallest incompliance with proper requirements. So now let’s think about e-juice (the nicotine product used in e cigs) for a moment. Presently, there are no rules or polices in place regulating its production, who may make it, how it’s stored or even its shelf-life. Essentially, you or I can go on the internet, purchase e liquid products and begin mixing it inside our basements with no legal requirements whatsoever. Obviously for private use this would seem appropriate. Nevertheless, I don’t know of a comparable product intended for human inhalation which you may prepare for yourself let alone for mass consumption by offering it for sales on the world-wide-web. Nevertheless this is exactly what various e juice marketers are in fact doing.

Please don’t misunderstand me. I am no way saying that e-liquid is dangerous. I’m saying we have a serious hazard that as a result of insufficient regulation, a contaminated e-juice might theoretically fall into the hands of an ecigarette user. So now you will likely consider the e-liquid that is made by the smokeless cigarette suppliers themselves? Here yet again, we basically have the same situation. Made for the most part in India, there is no regulation of any form regarding how this eliquid is manufactured. Ultimately, it seems folks searching for e-juice should think about the saying caveat emptor or “Let the buyer beware”.

Which manufacturer makes the best smokeless cigarettes? To find out, visit William Parella’s site. You will find reviews and comparisons of all the top brands of smoke free cigarette and available accessories.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Technorati Tags: addiction, Alternative Medicine, diseases, drug addiction, fitness, health, health and science, health care, health/fitness, home health, homeopathy, medicine, Quit Smoking Effects, self improvement